L'Atelier MOUVEMENT du Réseau des Sciences Cognitives
d'Ile de France (RESCIF)
organise une demi-journée scientifique intitulée :
"LA BALLE AU BOND : UNE APPROCHE DYNAMIQUE
DES GESTES DE CAPTURE"
Date : 24 Septembre 2002
Heure : 14h - 18h
Lieu : Institut universitaire de France,
Maison des Universités, 103 Bd Saint Michel, 75005 Paris
RER B Luxembourg
Capturer, frapper, saisir ou lancer une balle sont quelques
exemples qui imposent de coordonner avec une extrême précision
non seulement les différents segments corporels proximaux et distaux,
mais également l'effecteur et le mobile. Ce symposium a pour objectif
de présenter quelques unes des recherches les plus récentes
issues des sciences du mouvement, portant sur le contrôle des gestes
de préhension, de capture, ou de frappe. Un intérêt
particulier est porté aux mécanismes perceptifs et moteurs
impliqués dans la production, la régulation, et l'apprentissage
de ces habiletés. La démarche commune adoptée par
les intervenants est de mettre l'accent sur la simplicité et l'élégance
des mécanismes de contrôle mis en jeu. Ce symposium prend
la forme d'une série d'interventions de 30 mn par des experts
reconnus dans le champ, entrecoupées et suivies d'un débat
général.
Pour toute information, merci de contacter Benoît
Bardy
|
Programme
14: 00 - 14:10 |
Benoît BARDY Introduction |
14:10 - 14:40 |
Dagmar STERNAD (Department of Kinesiology,
Pennsyvania State University, USA) Tuning into dynamic stability:
Acquisition and performance of a rhythmic ball skill |
|
Abstract :
Hitting a ball rhythmically with a racket is a perceptual-motor
skill that requires the fine control of the timing and force
of impact between racket and ball in order to control the amplitude
or frequency of the ball's trajectories. In previous work, a
model for a ball bouncing on a table was developed in form of
a discrete nonlinear map, consisting of an oscillating table
and a ball following a parabolic flight trajectory after elastic
impact (Schaal, Sternad, & Atkeson, 1996). While a single
ball trajectory following one racket contact is entirely determined
by the velocity of ball and table at impact, stability analysis
of the periodic system revealed that it is the acceleration of
the racket at impact that determines the stability of the periodic
ball-racket movements.
Specifically, if the racket acceleration at impact is negative and within a
given range, the ball's flight is dynamically stable across repeated bouncing.
Dynamically stable performance implies that small perturbations need not be
corrected explicitly but that they converge back to the periodic attractor.
In a series of experiments we demonstrated that human performers hit the ball
with negative racket accelerations to produce a consistent bouncing amplitude/period.
These results supported the interpretation that coordination of this complex
perceptual-motor skill is governed by a single "essential" parameter
and humans can exploit the dynamical properties of ball-racket system in terms
of a mono-parametric control (Sternad, Duarte, Katsumata, & Schaal, 2000).
If humans attune to dynamical stability and racket acceleration at impact is
the essential parameter, this parameter should be optimized during the acquisition
and improvement of task performance. Three experiments examined the influence
of long-term experience on task performance and the change during a short-term
learning process. For the experimental apparatus with the specific coefficient
of restitution, the range of optimal impact accelerations was calculated to
be between -5 and -3m/s2. For all three experiments subjects were instructed
to bounce the ball periodically with an invariant ball amplitude throughout
the duration of one trial (30sec).
Racket acceleration at impact served as the primary dependent measure. In Experiment
1, six subjects bounced a ball either with their experienced, i.e., dominant,
or with their less experienced, i.e., nondominant hand. In accordance with
the hypothesis, racket accelerations were more negative (mean: -4.2m/s2) in
performance with the dominant hand than with the nondominant hand (mean: -2.0m/s2),
implying a higher degree of stability in performance with the dominant hand.
These results were associated with less variability in ball ampltiudes in performance
with the dominant hand.
In Experiment 2, six subjects performed a sequence of 40 trials of 30sec duration
each, using either their dominant or their nondominant hand.
Variability in performance decreased across trials for both hands, testifying
improvement. Higher initial variability in the less experienced hand decreased
to the same level as the dominant hand. This change was accompanied by an exponential
decrease in racket accelerations from positive values to a mean value of -4m/s2.
In Experiment 3, six subjects performed the practice sequence of 20 trials
first with their dominant hand, followed by 20 trials with their nondominant
hand. Another six subjects reversed the order of hand. Again, decrease in variability
in the ball trajectory was accompanied by a tendency of racket accelerations
becoming more negative in each practice segment. In addition, transfer of skill
was observed from one hand to the other. These results support the hypothesis
that performance of this perceptual-motor skill involves the exploitation of
dynamic stability reducing the necessity for error-based corrections. Skill
acquisition involves fine-tuning the essential parameter which ensures dynamically
stable solutions of the motor task.
(NSF SBR-97-10312) |
14:50 - 15:20 |
Hermann MÜLLER (Sportwissenschaftliches
Institut, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken) Throwing
at a target - Without missing ? |
|
Abstract :
Repeated movements can not be reproduced in an identical fashion.
Especially in tasks in which subjects try to achieve a constant
movement outcome, like in most targeted throwing tasks, this
fact is a severe limiting factor for performance. Based on theoretical
considerations, that take into account that an unpredictable
error occurs during every trial, three different strategies are
identified that might contribute to an increase in performance:
Stability, Covariation, Noise-Reduction". Data from different
throwing tasks will be presented, that demonstrate (i.) that
subjects actually use all three strategies, and (ii.) that they
increase the extend of that use during acquisition. |
15:30 - 16:00 |
Gilles MONTAGNE (UMR Mouvement & Perception,
Univ. Méditerrannée) Balle de math |
|
Abstract :
Une action d'interception peut être réalisée
sans rien connaître des caractéristiques spatio
temporelles du point de rencontre avec le mobile.
Pour ce faire, il suffit d'adapter son mouvement en cours d'exécution,
sur la base des informations présentes dans les flux perceptifs. Cet
exposé est destiné à présenter un certain nombre
d'arguments théoriques et empiriques en faveur de cette hypothèse. |
16:10 - 16:40 |
Nicolas BENGUIGUI (Centre de Recherches en
Sciences du Sport, Univ. Paris XI) Intercepter un mobile qui accélère |
|
Abstract :
Au cours de cette présentation, l'utilisation d'informations
relatives à l'accélération du mobile dans
les actions d'interception sera questionnée à travers
une série d'expérimentations reposant sur des tâches
prédictives. Lorsque les participants sont placés
devant des trajectoires accélérées ou décélérées
présentées dans un ordre aléatoire, la prédiction
précise du temps de pré-contact du mobile n'est
guerre possible et les participants commettent des erreurs conformes à l'hypothèse
d'une utilisation d'information de premier ordre (e.g., tau).
En revanche, lorsque la même trajectoire (accélérée
ou décélérée) est présentée
plusieurs fois de suite, les participants sont capables de minimiser
les erreurs. Ce dernier résultat souligne l'existence
de stratégies alternatives permettant de compenser l'incapacité du
système perceptivo-moteur humain à utiliser des
informations rendant compte de l'accélération d'un
mobile. |
16:50 - 17:20 |
Blandine BRIL (EHESS, Paris)
Capacité d'anticipation et maîtrise de la marche
autonome |
|
Joe McINTYRE (Laboratoire de Physiologie
de la Perception et de l'Action, Collège de France) Titre
non communiqué
|
17:30 - 18:00 |
Discussion générale |
|
|
|
Contact :
Benoit G. Bardy,
Professor
Center for Research in Sport Sciences
University of Paris Sud XI
Batiment 335, 91405 Orsay cedex, France
+33 1 69 15 43 18 (voice) / +33 1 69 15 62 22 (fax)
|
|